![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
a_shenИз выступления российского представителя на генеральной ассамблее ООН (изложение на официальном сайте: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2009/ga10853.doc.htm)
"the vote’s outcome indicated that a specific group of countries continued to use double standards and a political approach to bringing about a solution in the region.
...those same countries had prevented the Security Council from extending the mandate of the United Nations presence in the region and had stubbornly prevented the genuine truth from emerging about the situation. Since the backers of the initiative persisted in rejecting reasonable dialogue, Russian Federation believed that those countries who voted for the counterproductive text would shoulder full responsibilities for the consequences of its adoption."
на том же сайте можно посмотреть список countries "voted for the counterpductive text":
Albania, Andorra, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Saint Lucia, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Vanuatu
Upd: это голосование по резолюции (как и написано), а не по предвариительному вопросу о прекращении слушаний.
Кстати, для сравнения в 1983 г. обсуждение в Совете безопасности (приводится по http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/4175218/vetoes-2008-2)
12/09/83 S/15966/Rev 1 (The shooting down by the Soviet Union of a South Korean civil airliner; resolution deeply deplored the destruction of the airliner and invited Secretary-General to conduct a full investigation and to report his findings within 14 days)
результаты голосования:
за-9 против-2 (СССР, Польша) воздержались-4 (China Guyana Nicaragua Zimbabwe)
"the vote’s outcome indicated that a specific group of countries continued to use double standards and a political approach to bringing about a solution in the region.
...those same countries had prevented the Security Council from extending the mandate of the United Nations presence in the region and had stubbornly prevented the genuine truth from emerging about the situation. Since the backers of the initiative persisted in rejecting reasonable dialogue, Russian Federation believed that those countries who voted for the counterproductive text would shoulder full responsibilities for the consequences of its adoption."
на том же сайте можно посмотреть список countries "voted for the counterpductive text":
Albania, Andorra, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Saint Lucia, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Vanuatu
Upd: это голосование по резолюции (как и написано), а не по предвариительному вопросу о прекращении слушаний.
Кстати, для сравнения в 1983 г. обсуждение в Совете безопасности (приводится по http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/4175218/vetoes-2008-2)
12/09/83 S/15966/Rev 1 (The shooting down by the Soviet Union of a South Korean civil airliner; resolution deeply deplored the destruction of the airliner and invited Secretary-General to conduct a full investigation and to report his findings within 14 days)
результаты голосования:
за-9 против-2 (СССР, Польша) воздержались-4 (China Guyana Nicaragua Zimbabwe)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
необходимость
Date: 2009-09-10 08:24 pm (UTC)Re: необходимость
Date: 2009-09-10 09:34 pm (UTC)В Косово есть полноценное международное присутствие - тем не менее, обеспечивать безопасность все еще остающихся там сербов KFOR'у если и удается, то (насколько я могу судить) с очень большим скрипом.
если речь идет
Date: 2009-09-10 09:52 pm (UTC)но, конечно, это было бы непросто, даже если такое себе и представить